Mini-Mize Me?

June 21, 2008
By

A few years ago Morgan Spurlock’s documentary “Super Size Me” offered an unappetizing view of America’s oversized appetite for fast food–and the dirty underbelly of what happens when one person lives on fast food alone. I couldn’t help but think of “Super Size Me” on opposite day (as SpongeBob loves to celebrate; click here for an “Opposite Day” episode on JibJab) when I read in the newspaper this past week about shrinking package sizes.

It seems that the Kellogg Company began rolling out reduced-sized cereal boxes at the beginning of June–boxes that are 2.4 ounces smaller than their predecessors but more expensive. Supposedly, despite the smaller box size, Kellogg’s has raised cereal prices twice in the past six months. I can’t tell from this Associated Press story which boxes have shrunk–meaning is my 17 ounce box of Frosted Flakes now less than 15 ounces? Or did they shrink the smallest boxes out there? However, I do know that this shrinkage (“Seinfeld” anyone?) will affect kid favorites like Cocoa Krispies and Corn Pops.

Turns out that Kellogg’s isn’t alone in shrinking packaging. General Mills did this about a year ago with its cereals, and I’ve noticed that a lot of the ice cream makers are doing this, too. Recently, when ordering my groceries online, I went to select a half gallon of ice cream from either Breyer’s or Turkey Hill, but noticed that a half gallon of ice cream–or 64 ounces–was nearly impossible to come by these days. In fact, a half gallon of ice cream has simply become a misnomer.

Now, ice cream comes in 56-ounce packages or 1.75 quarts. I noticed this change about a year ago. Well, now ice cream packages are getting even smaller–the Turkey Hill Extreme Cookies and Cream I just purchased came in a 48-ounce container or 1.5 quarts. Of course, has the price dropped on ice cream? Hardly. If anything it’s gone up.

Normally, I would laud companies for finding smaller ways to package their products, such as how Tide has concentrated its liquid detergent so that it can be sold in smaller containers that, not surprisingly, use less plastic. I mean smaller packaging means less waste, and isn’t that the green way to think about things?

But when it comes to food, I hate this notion of giving me less for more money. Then again, with gas over the $4-a-gallon mark nationally, I guess we should all get used to getting less for more money.

Share

5 Responses to Mini-Mize Me?

  1. Doreen on June 21, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    Hi Leah – Just discovered your blog and I love it! Very informative & enjoyable to read. Congrats on your 1st anniversary too!

  2. ~M on June 21, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    Ugh, I noticed this with Tropicana OJ. I think it used to be 96 oz and now is 84oz, same price.

  3. Leah Ingram on June 22, 2008 at 10:07 pm

    Thanks for the anniversary wishes and the compliments!

    Re: OJ, really? That’s shrinking, too? But not the price, right?

    Leah

  4. Sarah on June 25, 2008 at 2:02 am

    Small packaging = less waste is only true when it means you get the same amount of product with less packaging, as in concentrated detergents. With foods like this smaller packaging actually means more waste, (you have to buy more packages to get the same amount of stuff) so that’s another reason to be distressed at this trend.

  5. Leah Ingram on June 25, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    Sarah:

    That’s a really good point. Trust me, I’m not happy about the smaller packaging when it comes to food, and this is another reason to be annoyed. So what to do–start shopping all the time at warehouse stores? I’d actually read an article that said green-oriented folks are doing this more, warehouse-club shopping. Maybe this is why? I’ll try to investigate this topic in the near future.

    Leah